Wednesday, February 3, 2010

'Climategate' gets more and more interesting


By now I'm sure everyone's heard of 'Climategate', the treasure-trove of e-mails exchanged between proponents of 'global warming' and 'climate change', which have demonstrated conclusively that many of the said proponents have been falsifying, hiding and twisting data for years - decades! - to support their theories. (Warning: the Wikipedia link provided above is subject to editing by pro-climate-change individuals who have, in the past, suppressed dissenting views, so you may want to read more widely if you require further information.) Now that this correspondence is out in the open, it's proving what some have been saying for a very long time: that an elitist scientific and academic cabal tried to ride roughshod over correct scientific investigation in order to promote an ideological agenda that was not based on fact.

Philip Stott in the UK has a very interesting look at the current state of affairs.

For over a month now, since the farcical conclusion of the Copenhagen Climate Change Conference, I have been silent, partly through family commitments abroad in the USA, but also because, in this noisy world, in ‘The Clamour Of The Times’, it is on occasion better to be quiet and contemplative, to observe rather than to comment. And, as an independent academic, it has been fascinating to witness the classical collapse of a Grand Narrative, in which social and philosophical theories are being played out before our gaze. It is like watching the Berlin Wall being torn down, concrete slab by concrete slab, brick by brick, with cracks appearing and widening daily on every face - political, economic, and scientific. Likewise, the bloggers have been swift to cover the crumbling edifice with colourful graffiti, sometimes bitter, at others caustic and witty.

. . .

And what can one say about ‘the science’? ‘The ‘science’ is already paying dearly for its abuse of freedom of information, for unacceptable cronyism, for unwonted arrogance, and for the disgraceful misuse of data at every level, from temperature measurements to glaciers to the Amazon rain forest. What is worse, the usurping of the scientific method, and of justified scientific scepticism, by political policies and political propaganda could well damage science sensu lato - never mind just climate science - in the public eye for decades.

. . .

... the biggest collapse is in the media, the very ‘mechanism’ through which the greedy Global Warming Grand Narrative has promulgated itself during the last ten to twenty years.

The break in the ‘Media Wall’ began in the tabloids and in the ‘red tops’, ... but it is today spreading rapidly - yet once more as theory predicts - to the so-called ‘heavyweights’ and to the BBC. In the past, uncritical and apocalyptic stories and programmes were given the highest prominence, with any sceptical comment confined to the briefest of quotations from some benighted, and often snidely-mentioned, sceptic squeezed in at the very end of the piece (“For balance, you know”). Today, the reverse is becoming true, with the ‘global warming’ faithful firmly forced on to the back foot. Yet, in our post-modern world, it is the journalistic language being employed that is the true indicator of a new media order. Listening to good old Roger Harrabin this morning, reporting on BBC Radio 4’s flagship ‘Today’ programme, was a revelation in this respect; the language, and even the style, had altered radically.

The collapse is now so precipitate that there will inevitably be some serious losers caught out by it all. The UK Met Office could well be one, with the BBC rightly reviewing its contract with them. At the moment, Met Office spokespersons sound extraordinary, bizarre even. They bleat out ‘global warming’ phrases like programmed robotic sheep, although they are finding it increasingly difficult to pull the wool over our eyes. It is terribly 1984, and rather chilling, so to speak. It is obvious that the organisation is suffering from another classical academic state, namely that known as ‘cognitive dissonance’ [see here and here]. This is experienced when belief in a Grand Narrative persists blindly, even when the facts in the real world begin to contradict what the narrative is saying. Sadly, many of our public and private organisations have allowed themselves to develop far too great a vested interest in ‘global warming’, as have too many politicians and activists. These are increasingly terrified, many having no idea how to react, or how to adjust, to the collapse. It will be particularly interesting to witness how, in the end, the Royal Society plays its cards, especially if competing scientific paradigms, such as the key role played by water vapour in climate change, start to displace the current paradigm in classic fashion.

. . .

I have long predicted, and in public too, that the Copenhagen Conference could prove to be the beginning of the end for the Global Warming Grand Narrative. It appears that I may well have been right, and, indeed, I may have considerably underestimated the speed, and the dramatic nature, of the demise.

Where this all leaves our politicians and political parties in the UK; where it leaves climate science, scientists more generally, and the Royal Society; where it leaves energy policy; where it leaves the ‘Green’ movement; and, where it leaves our media will have to be topics for many later comments and analyses.

For the moment, we must not underestimate the magnitude of the collapse. Academically, it is jaw-dropping to observe.


There's more at the link. Highly recommended reading. Mr. Stott's comments are about developments in the UK, of course, but similar effects are being felt here in the US as well.

I'm under no illusions that the battle against the global warming/climate change alarmists has been won. They've invested far too much of their time, money and personal intellectual credibility into their campaign to simply walk away from it. The big thing is, though, that their lies, smear campaigns and falsehoods have been stripped away. From now on they're going to have an uphill battle convincing those who've been following recent developments that there's any fire behind the smoke to which they point so grandiloquently.

I'm irresistibly reminded of a bumper sticker I saw here in Louisiana not too long ago:


AL GORE CAN KISS MY CARBON FOOTPRINT


Quite so!





Peter

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

The real concern in the US is will the mainstream media continue to buy into the global warming lies or will they start telling the truth.

How many stories has the MSM done on Climategate? I've only seen this info on the Internet. The average person probably thinks we still have a global warming crisis. We must somehow change this.

Anonymous said...

I highly recommend the following web sites: "Climate Audit," www.icecap.us, Anthony Watts's "Watts up with that" blog and "Real Climate." The last is a very aggressively pro-warming blog and makes a useful comparison with the others.

Given how mush money G.E. has sunk into carbon credits, wind energy and other aspects of this boondoggle, I'm not surprised that the stateside media is so quiet.

I just hope this doesn't end up with the baby of conservation and wise-use getting tossed with the bathwater of AGW (anthropogenic global warming).
LittleRed1

bruce said...

scroll down to the Parody in Custard and its follow up. Its very entertaining.
Plus this is an excellent web site that keeps up with the "warming's" cooling.



http://joannenova.com.au/

Anonymous said...

Seconding the "Watts up with that Blog" not only for the climate info, but for the journalistic integrity that is sorely lacking in many other institutions these days.